Media coverage

Soap Box Malcolm Gooderham | PR Week

Malcolm Gooderham

A year on from BP’s Deepwater Horizon fiasco, many lessons should now have been learned. From a PR perspective, they include the short-comings of the crisis comms effort and the leadership style of Tony Hayward.

Parallels are being drawn with Andrew Lansley and the communication of his plan for NHS reform. Both are learning a lesson in strategic leadership. Simply put, unless the ‘story’ is both accessible and credible, it will not be understood, let alone generate support. Hayward failed to build support at both local and national levels. Lansley has studiously courted vested interests, but ultimately failed to bring them on his journey.

He may always have been destined to fail given the nature of his reforms, while Hayward may never have pacified public opinion. However, both have seemingly aggravated their situations – Hayward spectacularly.

Ultimately, both did not successfully articulate their plans for their audience, instead surrendering the agenda to critical voices. When this happens, it is almost impossible to reverse media and public opinion. Lansley’s attempt to do so, by now engaging in a public listening exercise, shows shrewd judgement.

The key question may be whether the voter feels engaged enough to listen and able to understand his plans. If they are deaf to reform, he will need to think again.

Read more

Jonathan Oliver on PR disasters in the digital age | PR Week

Own goal: A footballer’s injunction looked to have backfired spectacularly when he appeared on the front page of almost every national newspaper, after being named in Parliament. The injunction aimed to cover up an alleged affair with reality TV star Imogen Thomas. The player’s lawyers courted further controversy by threatening to sue Twitter. As PRWeek went to press, the injunction remained in place.

HOW I SEE IT

Jonathan Oliver, Director of media relations, TLG

This will surely enter the pantheon of PR disasters alongside the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and Gerald Ratner’s four-letter critique of his eponymous jewellery range.

The mistake was not the decision to take out an injunction last month – the big error was to use the Twitter innuendoes as an opportunity to create media case law.

The decision to sue the Californian social networking site may make the reputations of the lawyers who issue the writ, but it has helped detonate the good name of their client.

A bit of PR common sense could have ring-fenced this tawdry kiss-and-tell story in the red tops. Instead, these allegations have been aired by what feels like every media channel from the Radio 4 Today programme to the Adelaide Advertiser.

Read more
1